تئوری بازی ها در انتخاب اتحادهای استراتژیک بر مبنای استراتژی نوآوری؛ بررسی صنعت فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات ایران
محورهای موضوعی : مدیریت استراتژیک
فاطمه حاج اسمعیلیان
1
(دانشگاه تهران)
هوشنگ نظامی وند چگینی
2
(دانشگاه شهید بهشتی)
طهمورث حسنقلی پور
3
(دانشگاه تهران)
کلید واژه: اتحاد استراتژیک, تئوری بازی ها, استراتژی نوآوری, فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات,
چکیده مقاله :
صنعت فناوری اطلاعات با پیروی از الگوی دیگر کشورها از سرمایه محور بودن به سمت خدمات محور بودن در ایران پیش می‌رود. این اتفاق سبب شده که مدل های سنتی کسب و کار به چالش کشیده شود. از همین روی بازیگران فاوا با نگاهی متفاوت در دهه جدید، فعالیت‌های خود را آغاز کرده‌اند. فعالان صنعت نیز اتحادهای استراتژیک را یکی از مهمترین اشکال سازمانی مدرن، برای حفظ رقابت پذیری مدنظر دارند. در این تحقیق با هدف کمک به فرایند تصمیم‌سازی مدیران صنعت، با شناسایی عوامل مؤثر بر انتخاب متحد استراتژیک و استراتژی نوآوری با رویکرد تحلیل فراترکیب بالغ بر 1400 پژوهش علمی، و بومی‌سازی عوامل با تکنیک دلفی فازی نشان داد که سرمایه‌گذاری، هزینه، سطح نوآوری، منابع ناملموس، منابع بازاریابی، ریسک تجاری‌سازی، پارامترهای مالی و عدم اطمینان زمانی موثرترین‌ها هستند. بعلاوه مدیران صنعت می‌توانند با مدل کمی ارائه شده در این پژوهش که مبتنی بر چانه‌زنی نش ارائه شده است، به نوع بهینه ائتلاف استراتژیک بر مبنای استراتژی نوآوری از میان تسهیم سود، تسهیم تأمین مالی، تسهیم نوآوری و یا تلفیق آن‌ها دست‌یابند.
The ICT industry is moving from a capital-centric towards a services-centric one. This is due to the emergence of technologies and infrastructures and businesses that challenge the business models of traditional players. Hence, the actors have begun their work with a different look at the innovation strategy of the new decade. On the other hand, industry activists have considered strategic alliances as one of the most important organizational forms in modern society in recent years. The purpose of this study is to help the managers by identifying the factors influencing the selection of strategic partners and, in particular, the factors based on the innovation strategy, through first analysis of more than 1,400 scientific researches and second customizing factors with the fuzzy Delphi technique. The results show that investment (financing), cost, level of innovation, intangible resources, marketing resources, commercialization risk, time uncertainty and financial parameters are the most effective ones. In addition, industry executives can come up with the type of optimal strategic alliance through profit sharing, financing sharing, innovation sharing, or a mixed of these three, with a quantitative model presented in this research based on Nash bargaining
Adner, R. (2006). Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard business review, 84(4), 98.#
Aghaee, A. (1390). Key effective factors on customer’s loyalty in hygienic and health industry using Fuzzy Delphi and Fuzzy DEMATEL. Danesh Modiriat, 13(4).#
Amaldoss, W., & Staelin, R. (2010). Cross-function and same-function alliances: how does alliance structure affect the behavior of partnering firms?. Management Science, 56(2), 302-317.#
Amaldoss, W., & Rapoport, A. (2005). Collaborative product and market development: Theoretical implications and experimental evidence. Marketing Science, 24(3), 396-414.#
Amaldoss, W., Meyer, R. J., Raju, J. S., & Rapoport, A. (2000). Collaborating to compete. Marketing Science, 19(2), 105-126.#
Amit, R. and Zott, C. (2001). Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22, pp. 493–520.#
Arsenyan, J., & Büyüközkan, G. (2014). Modelling collaborative product development using axiomatic design principles: application to software industry. Production Planning & Control, 25(7), 515-547.#
Argyres, N. S., & Silverman, B. S. (2004). R&D, organization structure, and the development of corporate technological knowledge. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8‐9), 929-958.#
Barkema, H. G., Shenkar, O., Vermeulen, F., & Bell, J. H. (1997). Working abroad, working with others: How firms learn to operate international joint ventures. Academy of Management journal, 40(2), 426-442. #
Bain and Company,(2006). Management Tools-The Tools-Strategic Alliances [On-line], January.
Brouthers, K. D., & Bamossy, G. J. (2006). Post‐formation processes in Eastern and Western European joint ventures. Journal of Management Studies, 43(2), 203-229.#
Cai, G., & Kock, N. (2009). An evolutionary game theoretic perspective on e-collaboration: The collaboration effort and media relativeness. European Journal of Operational Research, 194(3), 821-833.#
Center for Strategic Studies (1396), Analyzing 6ht developmental program.#
Chen, S. H., Wang, P. W., Chen, C. M., & Lee, H. T. (2010). An analytic hierarchy process approach with linguistic variables for selection of an R&D strategic alliance partner. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 58(2), 278-287. #
Christoffersen, J. (2013). A review of antecedents of international strategic alliance performance: synthesized evidence and new directions for core constructs. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(1), 66-85. #
Cohen, W. M., & Klepper, S. (1996). A reprise of size and R & D. The Economic Journal, 106(437), 925-951. #
Cohen, W. M., & Klepper, S. (1992). The anatomy of industry R&D intensity distributions. The American Economic Review, 773-799.#
Combs, J. G., & Ketchen Jr, D. J. (2003). Why do firms use franchising as an entrepreneurial strategy?: A meta-analysis. Journal of management, 29(3), 443-465.#
Combs, J. G., Ketchen, D. J., Shook, C. L., & Short, J. C. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of franchising: Past accomplishments and future challenges. Journal of Management, 37, 99-126.#
Culpan, R. (2009). A fresh look at strategic alliances: research issues and future directions. International Journal of Strategic Business Alliances, 1(1), 4-23. #
Datta, D. K., Musteen, M., & Herrmann, P. (2009). Board characteristics, managerial incentives, and the choice between foreign acquisitions and international joint ventures. Journal of Management, 35(4), 928-953.#
Doz, Y. L., & Hamel, G. (1998). Alliance advantage: The art of creating value through partnering. Harvard Business Press. 1996.#
Dussauge P, Garrette B, Mitchell W. (2004). Asymmetric performance: the market share impact of scale and link alliances in the global auto industry. Strategic Management Journal, 25(7): 701–711.#
Elenkov, D.S. and Manev, I.M. (2005). Top management leadership and influence on innovation: the role of sociocultural context. Journal of Management, 31, pp. 381– 402.#
Esmaeili, M., Aryanezhad, M. B., & Zeephongsekul, P. (2009). A game theory approach in seller–buyer supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 195(2), 442-448.#
Glaister, K. W., & Buckley, P. J. (1996). Strategic motives for international alliance formation. Journal of Management Studies, 33, 301-332.#
Golden, P. A., & Dollinger, M. (1993). Cooperative alliances and competitive strategies in small manufacturing firms. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 17(4), 43-56. #
Goldsmith, P., Adams, C. L. (1998). Managerial decision making in agribusiness: Strategic alliances as a governance choice.#
Gulati, R., Nohria, N., & Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic networks. Strategic management journal, 21(3), 203-215.#
Hamel, G. (2000). Leading the Revolution. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.#
Hillebrand, B., & Biemans, W. G. (2003). The relationship between internal and external cooperation: literature review and propositions. Journal of Business Research, 56(9), 735-743.#
Hitt, M.A., Ricart i Costa, J.E. and Nixon, R.D. (1998). The newfrontier.InHitt, M.A.,RicartiCosta,J.E.andNixon, R.D. (eds), Managing Strategically in an Interconnected World. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 1–12.#
Inkpen, A. C., & Currall, S. C. (2004). The coevolution of trust, control, and learning in joint ventures. Organization science, 15(5), 586-599. #
Kale, P., & Singh, H. (2007). Building firm capabilities through learning: the role of the alliance learning process in alliance capability and firm‐level alliance success. Strategic management journal, 28(10), 981-1000.#
Kaufmann, A., & Gupta, M. M. (1988). Fuzzy mathematical models in engineering and management science. Elsevier Science Inc.#
Koka, B. R., & Prescott, J. E. (2008). Designing alliance networks: the influence of network position, environmental change, and strategy on firm performance. Strategic management journal, 29(6), 639-661.#
Kaya, O. (2011). Outsourcing vs. in-house production: a comparison of supply chain contracts with effort dependent demand. Omega, 39(2), 168-178. #
Laaksonen, T., Jarimo, T., & Kulmala, H. I. (2009). Cooperative strategies in customer–supplier relationships: The role of interfirm trust. International Journal of Production Economics, 120(1), 79-87.#
Larsson, R., & Finkelstein, S. (1999). Integrating strategic, organizational, and human resource perspectives on mergers and acquisitions: A case survey of synergy realization. Organization science, 10(1), 1-26.#
Lee, H., Kim, D., & Seo, M. (2013). Market valuation of marketing alliance in East Asia: Korean evidence. Journal of Business Research, 66, 2492-2499. #
Lee, J.-W., Abosag, I., & Kwak, J. (2012). The role of networking and commitment in foreign market entry process: Multinational corporation in the Chinese automobile industry. International Business Review, 21, 27-39.#
Lui, S. S., & Ngo, H-y. (2012). Drivers and outcomes of Long-term orientation in cooperative relationship. British Journal of Management, 23, 80-95.#
Manyika, J., Lund, S., Bughin, J., Woetzel, J. R., Stamenov, K., & Dhingra, D. (2016). Digital globalization: The new era of global flows (Vol. 4). San Francisco: McKinsey Global Institute.#
Min, J., & Mitsuhashi, H. (2012). Dynamics of unclosed triangles in alliance networks: Disappearance of brokerage positions and performance consequences. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 1078-1108.#
Ministry of Information, communication and Technology. (1396). Annual report.#
Mudambi, S. M., & Tallman, S. (2010). Make, buy or ally? . Theoretical perspectives on knowledge process outsourcing through alliances. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 1434-1456.#
Nagarajan, M., & Sošić, G. (2008). Game-theoretic analysis of cooperation among supply chain agents: Review and extensions. European Journal of Operational Research, 187(3), 719-745.#
Nash, J., Jr. (1950). The bargaining problem. Econometrica, 18(2) 155–162.#
Nielsen, B. B., & Gudergan, S. (2012). Exploration and exploitation fit and performance in international strategic alliances. International Business Review, 21, 558-574.#
Park, C. V., & Lee, I. C. (2012). Korean international joint ventures: How the exchange climate affects tacit knowledge transfer from foreign partners. International Marketing review, 29, 151-174.#
Parkhe, A. (1993a). Messy research, methodological predispositions, and theory development in international joint ventures. The Academy of Management Review, 18, 227 -268.#
Parkhe, A. (1993b). Strategic alliance structuring: A game theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation. The academy of Management Journal, 36, 794-929.#
Parliamentary Research Center of Iran, Fundamental Research Department. (1398). Challenges and solutions for Production boom, IT section.#
Pisano, G. P. (2015). You need an innovation strategy. Harvard Business Review, 93(6), 44-54.#
Poulis, K., Yamin, M., & Polis, E. (2012). Domestic firms competing with multinational enterprises: The relevance of resource-accessing alliance formation. International Business review, 21, 588-601.#
Reuer, J. J., Zollo, M., & Singh, H. (2002). Post‐formation dynamics in strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 23(2), 135-151. #
Ripolles, M., Blesa, A., & Monferrer, D. (2012). Factors enhancing the choice of higher resource commitment entry modes in international new ventures. International Business Review, 21, 648- 666.#
Russo, M., & Cesarani, M. (2017). Strategic alliance success factors: A literature review on alliance lifecycle.#
Samaddar, S., & Kadiyala, S. S. (2006). An analysis of interorganizational resource sharing decisions in collaborative knowledge creation. European Journal of operational research, 170(1), 192-210.#
Sandelowski, M. and Barroso, J. (2003). Toward a meta synthesis of qualitative findings on motherhood in HIV-positive women. Research in Nursing & Health, 26 (2): 153-170.#
Shane, S. A. (1998). Making new franchise systems work. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 697-707.#
Slater, S. A. R. M (2012). Social Capital in Japanese- Western Alliances: Understanding cultural effects. International Marketing Review, 29, 6023.#
Subramanian, A. M., & Soh, P. H. (2017). Linking alliance portfolios to recombinant innovation: The combined effects of diversity and alliance experience. Long Range Planning, 50(5), 636-652.#
Subramaniam, M. and Venkatraman, N. (1999). The influence of leveraging tacit overseas knowledge for global new product development capability: an empirical examination. In Hitt, M.A., Clifford, P.G., Nixon, R.D. and Coyne, K.P. (eds), Dynamic Strategic Resources. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 373–401.#
Shipilov, A., & Stern, I. (2016). Applications virtual special issue: Practical advice on how to unlock value from your alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 37(1).#
Takai, S. (2010). A game-theoretic model of collaboration in engineering design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 132(5), 051005.#
Tavassoli, S., & Karlsson, C. (2015). Firms’ Innovation Strategies Analyzed and Explained. Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 396, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS-Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies, 1.#
United Nation (2016). Science technology and innovation review, Islamic republic of Iran. UNCTD.
Xia, J. (2011) Mutual dependence, partner substitutability, and repeated partnership: The survival of cross-border alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 32, 229-253.#
Zahra, S.A. and Nielsen, A.P. (2002). Sources of capabilities, integration and technology commercialization. Strategic Management Journal, 23, pp. 377–398.#
Zenger, T. R. (1994). Explaining organizational diseconomies of scale in R&D: Agency problems and the allocation of engineering talent, ideas, and effort by firm size. Management science, 40(6), 708-729.#